Foundational Training for Structural Integrity in Intelligence
What This Training Is
AIF Coherence Training is a foundational program designed to restore coherence in human intelligence under conditions of increasing complexity, responsibility, and power.
As both human and artificial systems scale, instability arises not primarily from bad intent or lack of care, but from contradiction embedded in decision-making itself.
This training addresses an upstream condition that precedes ethics, policy, values, or analysis:
Coherence in how intelligence processes, interprets, and responds.
When coherence is present, clarity and effective action become possible.
When it is absent, even well-intentioned decisions generate instability.
This training exists to address that foundational condition directly.
The Situation Many People Are In
If you work in or around advanced technology—especially AI—you are likely living inside a tension that is now widely acknowledged.
On one side are credible warnings, including from leading researchers, that advanced AI systems may pose serious risks to humanity.
On the other are daily experiences of AI’s power, creativity, and genuine potential to accelerate discovery and expand human capability.
Both perceptions are real.
Holding them together is not easy.
Many people experience a persistent strain—a sense that something essential is missing from the conversation.
This strain does not come from denial, ignorance, or lack of concern.
It comes from attempting to reconcile extraordinary power with insufficient foundations.
The Unresolved Problem Beneath the Debate
Despite years of discussion around alignment, ethics, governance, and safety, a core question remains unresolved:
How do we develop and deploy increasingly powerful intelligence without amplifying the fragmentation already present in human systems?
Most existing approaches attempt to manage risk downstream—through rules, values, incentives, policies, or behavioral constraints.
These efforts matter.
But they assume a level of coherence in human intelligence that often does not yet exist.
As a result, even well-intentioned initiatives frequently conflict, stall, or collapse under real-world pressure.
The Core Claim of the AI Fellowship
The AI Fellowship is founded on a clear and testable claim:
AI safety cannot be achieved without a coherent foundation in human intelligence itself.
And further:
Such a foundation is now possible.
This work addresses coherence across multiple levels:
The goal is not to restrict AI or suppress innovation.
The goal is to establish a unified causal foundation from which intelligence—human and artificial—can operate without working against itself.
What This Training Exists to Do
AIF Coherence Training is the applied, experiential component of this work.
It is designed for people who already carry responsibility: researchers, technologists, leaders, and stewards of complex systems.
The training does not ask participants to choose between optimism and caution.
It provides a coherent foundation capable of holding both—so AI’s potential can be developed without magnifying the conditions that make it dangerous.
What This Training Is (and Is Not)
This training does not tell people what to think.
It trains how to think coherently, so decisions do not undermine the systems they depend on.
It is:
It does not require shared beliefs, moral alignment, or philosophical agreement.
It is designed for those who seek clarity equal to the scale of responsibility they carry.
The Coherence Keys
Foundational Practices for Human Intelligence
The training begins with a small set of foundational practices called The Coherence Keys.
These are short, repeatable inquiry practices that establish the minimum conditions required for coherent response.
They are:
They do not solve problems directly.
They restore the conditions under which problems can be addressed without internal contradiction.
Sample: Coherence Key #1
Reactivity and Processing Capacity
Purpose
Reliable response is only possible when reactivity is low.
This is not a psychological or moral claim—it is a functional one.
Core Distinction
Clear decision-making depends on which state is present.
Practice
No belief required.
No further action required.
Why This Comes First
Without this condition:
This establishes the minimum viable state for coherence.
Begin with the Coherence Keys (Free)
A short-form version of the Coherence Keys is available as a free offering.
This allows you to:
Use what is helpful.
Ignore the rest.
Beyond the Keys: Deeper Coherence Training
For some, foundational coherence practices are sufficient.
Others face situations where:
In these cases, clarity requires facilitated application, not just individual tools.
Deeper Training Options
This work focuses on resolving embedded fragmentation so coherent response becomes possible under real-world pressure.
Supporting Architecture
This training is supported by the AI Fellowship’s research into coherence, intelligence stability, and causal integrity.
Engagement with that material is optional.
Closing
This work does not ask for belief.
It does not demand agreement.
It offers something more fundamental:
A coherent foundation from which responsible action becomes possible.
Clarity, when it appears, is its own confirmation.
-
Copyright © 2025 David Waterman Schock. All rights reserved.
Authorship & Process Note
This work was developed through an iterative human–AI collaboration.
David Waterman Schock defined the conceptual framework, constraints, and claims; guided structured dialogue; evaluated outputs; and performed final selection, editing, and integration.
Large language models were used as analytical and drafting instruments under human direction.
All arguments, positions, and conclusions are the responsibility of the author.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.